Friday 7 December 2012

ill Small Businesses Suffer From Top Tier Tax Hike?

ill Small Businesses Suffer From Top Tier Tax Hike?

PHOTO: In this Nov. 16, 2012, file photo, President Barack Obama acknowledges House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio while speaking to reporters in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, D.C.
At a sprawling 25,000-square-foot factory outside Dayton, Ohio, David Curliss manufactures high-tech composite fibers, structural adhesives and special sealants known as syntactic foams. The small business he founded a decade ago has grown steadily since the recession, employing 21 workers on several production lines.
But now, with a tax hike on the horizon as part of a deficit-reduction deal as envisioned by President Obama and the Democrats, it may become more difficult to expand his business and hire, Curliss says.
"What it absolutely means is less cash for growth in my business," he told ABC News. "In the worst-case scenario, it means we let someone go or have to reduce benefits."
Curliss is among an estimated 940,000 Americans who will report more than $200,000 in business income on their individual tax returns in 2013 and pay at the top marginal rates, according to the bipartisan Joint Committee on Taxation.
They are now at the center of the political storm over the "fiscal cliff" and debate on whether to raise top income tax rates at the end of the year.
Obama wants the two upper tax brackets to rise from 33 and 35 percent to 36 and 39.6 percent, respectively. Republicans staunchly oppose any increase, largely citing the impact on companies like Curliss'.
Carolyn Kaster/AP Photo
In this Nov. 16, 2012, file photo, President... View Full Size
Performance Polymer Solutions, like thousands of small businesses, is structured as a so-called "pass-through" entity with the firm's income and profits passed directly to Curliss for reporting on his 1040. The company itself does not pay taxes.
On paper, the extra cash makes Curliss look like a rich man, subjecting his income to the top rates. Yet, he never actually sees the business income in his paycheck, he says. Instead, the money is kept inside the business to help it grow.
"Raising the top rates means there will be less cash in my company to reinvest in employees and benefits and equipment," he said.
Democrats, defending the need for revenue from the top 2 percent of U.S. income earners to help close the budget gap, say cases like Curliss' are the exception not the rule.
"Ninety-seven percent of small businesses would not see any increases in their income taxes," Obama said Thursday. "And even folks who make more than $250,000 would still have a tax break for their incomes up to $250,000."
Just 3 percent of more than 30 million Americans who report business income on their personal returns next year will pay at the top marginal rates, the Joint Committee found.
Many of them, colloquially referred to as "business owners," include independent doctors, lawyers and hedge fund managers whose companies are set up as "pass-through" entities with high incomes and few employees.
Experts say the vast majority of businesses paying taxes through the individual code are very small, make very little money and don't come remotely close to having to pay higher taxes if Obama gets his way.
The average income of a business that reports on an individual tax return is about $40,000, according to the Tax Policy Center.
"Most of these are sole proprietorships and their number of employees is zero," said Howard Gleckman, an analyst with the Center, noting that self-employed taxpayers include babysitters, plumbers and investors.
"All things equal, the lower the taxes, the better off we all are," Gleckman said. "The trade-off, though, is that if you believe the budget deficit is a big economic problem, and if you believe that the ultimate consequence of ongoing high deficits is higher interest rates, well then that's a cost, too."

Elizabeth Johnson Tells Judge She Deserves 'Max' at Sentencing, Gets 5 Years

Elizabeth Johnson Tells Judge She Deserves 'Max' at Sentencing, Gets 5 Years

PHOTO: Elizabeth Johnson, the mother of missing baby Gabriel Johnson, sits in court in Phoenix, Dec. 7, 2012. Gabriel was 8 months old at the time and last seen in San Antonio, Texas.
Elizabeth Johnson -- who at one point admitted to killing her son, the missing infant Gabriel Johnson, before saying she gave him away -- told a judge she "deserved the maximum" sentence, before receiving a prison term of 5.25 years, half of the max.
In October, Johnson, 26, was found guilty of custodial interference and unlawful imprisonment stemming from the disappearance of her 8-month-old son, last seen on Dec. 24, 2009. The baby's whereabouts remain unknown.
"I am brokenhearted over my son still being missing," said Johnson, wearing a striped prison jumpsuit. "I'm at a loss because I do deserve the max. What I have done is unconscionable. I would convict myself.
"I do deserve the maximum, I do," she said through tears. "[But it] wasn't how [the prosecution] made it out to be. It wasn't like that. That's all I have to say."
Judge Paul McMurdie said he wished he could design a sentence that would compel Johnson to disclose Gabriel's whereabouts, but could only "sentence her for the offenses [for which] she's been convicted."
Johnson, 26, will serve 5.25 years in an Arizona state prison, followed by four years of probation.
ABC News
Elizabeth Johnson, the mother of missing baby... View Full Size
Chilling Calls in Baby Gabriel Case Watch Video
Baby Gabriel Search at Texas Landfill Watch Video
Baby Gabriel's Mom Faces Judge Watch Video
At today's sentencing hearing, prosecutor Angela Andrews called Johnson' actions "despicable," but said the state would drop its request to see Johnson serve out a maximum sentence if she would tell authorities where her son could be found.
Johnson, who has been in jail for the past three years, faced a maximum of 9.5 years in prison on the two convictions. In October, the jury did not reach a verdict on a third charge of kidnapping.
Before Gabriel's disappearance, Johnson had been embroiled in a custody battle with the baby's biological father, Logan McQueary. The couple differed on putting their infant son up for adoption. Johnson had wanted to, McQueary did not.
"I think Elizabeth should be held accountable for her actions, for making my son disappear," Johnson told the court. "She should stay in jail until Gabriel is found or be given the maximum sentence as possible."
While she was fighting with McQueary over custody of their son, Johnson left Tempe, Ariz., with Gabriel and traveled to San Antonio, Texas, on Dec. 18, 2009. Johnson failed to bring Gabriel back to visit with McQueary two days later, violating a court custody order.
Gabriel was last seen with his mother on Dec. 26, 2009. The following day, Johnson sent text messages to McQueary saying she had killed him. Johnson was recorded telling McQueary that she suffocated their son with a towel until he turned blue. She said she then put his body in a diaper bag and put the bag in the trash.
Later, Johnson told authorities she gave Gabriel to a couple she met in a park in San Antonio, though she has never named who she gave the child to.
ABC News' Alexis Shaw contributed to this report.

Amber Hardman/Polaris

Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print
ps steve powell susan powell nt 121207 wblog Stephen Powell Took Thousands of Images of In Law Susan Powell
Amber Hardman/Polaris
The father-in-law of missing Utah mom Susan Powell had thousands of secretly snapped pictures of her stored on his computer and storage devices.
Nearly 4,500 images of Susan, including close-ups of her breasts and buttocks, were stored on the computer, according to the Associated Press, which obtained them under an open records request this week.
Numerous photos of Susan’s groin and face were stored in files titled “SMP” on storage disks, according to court documents obtained by ABC News.
The images were found during a search of the home that Stephen Powell and his son Josh Powell shared after Susan disappeared in 2009.
The search also yielded images of two young girls, Stephen Powell’s neighbors, who were photographed without their knowledge by Stephen while using the bathroom. Powell was found guilty of voyeurism for the photos of the young girls.
Prosecutors entered photos of the girls into evidence, as well as journal entries Stephen Powell had written about sexual fantasies he had of his daughter-in-law.
Grant Blinn, who prosecuted the case for Pierce County, Wash., confirmed the images’ existence to ABC News.
Neither Stephen nor Josh Powell were charged in connection with Susan’s disappearance. Josh was named a person of interest in the case, but killed himself and the couple’s children in a fiery home explosion in 2009.
Josh Powell had been ordered to undergo psychosexual evaluations in order to win custody of his sons back, after they were removed from his care because of the sexual content found in the Powell home during the police search.

Where: Ramkota Hotel.

Where: Ramkota Hotel.
• Admission: Tickets are $25. They're on sale at the Ramkota. For information, call 605-229-4040.
 Comedian Pauly Shore, a fixture on MTV in the early 1990s, continues to make people laugh, hitting the road to play in lots of different places.
 “I think at the end of the day I'm an artist, meaning I like to create," the comedian said. "And I like to be around small towns and go into places that I wouldn't expect to go."
 Those experiences free him up mentally “to find things. If I'm in Los Angeles all the time or in one place, mentally I get kind of stagnant. There's like a freedom of being on the road.”
 Wherever he goes, he likes to find smiling faces and positive energy.
 “So it doesn't really matter where I walk into. It's all about being welcomed.”
 Shore, who played in South Sioux City, Neb., on Thursday and goes to Okoboji, Iowa, tonight, will do two shows Saturday at the Ramkota Hotel in Aberdeen.
 “You come all that way to entertain. So you want people to come out and want to be entertained.”
 When Shore is out in public, he is met with joy from most people who are old enough to remember him from his heyday. People are especially fond of 1993’s “Son in Law” and “Bio-Dome” from 1996.
 “Those two in particular bring a lot of joy to people,” he said in a phone interview from the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Hollywood, Fla., where he was appearing.
 In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Shore was a frequent presence on MTV, hosting a show called “Totally Pauly.” His persona was a mellow, spacey California surfer dude known as "The Weasel." He addressed everyone with a drawn out, "Buuuuddddyy . . ."
 Asked about his movie preference, Shore said, “I liked ‘Son in Law’ a lot because it kind of got me out of that MTV audience into a mainstream audience.”
 Part of that film, incidentally, was set in South Dakota. But it was not filmed in the state.
 His shows Saturday night will be what people familiar with him would expect — fun, spontaneous, unexpected, he said.
 “And then the people that don't know who I am should come out as well and experience something different. I'm not the normal comic that's going to go up there and get stuck in a routine. I kind of screw around a lot,” he said.
 Until recently, Shore was devoting his attention to political specials. People can still buy his “Pauly-Tics” special on his website, paulyshore.com, for $5.

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan has ordered that the Shoaib Suddle Commission be dissolved. The one man commission was formed to probe the Asralan Iftikhar case.
A two member bench of the Supreme Court headed by Justice Jawaad S Khawaja heard the Arsalan Iftikhar case in which the commission’s report was presented. The court ordered that the findings of the report be made public.
The Supreme Court also wrapped proceedings of the case and stated this was an issue between two individuals and they could take up the matter in any forum.
Speaking to the media, Zahid Bukhari the counsel for Malik Riaz said they had raised reservations regarding the commission. According to Bukhari the commission will no longer be allowed to conduct any investigation. Bukhari maintained that the allegations against Arsalan Iftikhar leveled by Malik Riaz were accurate.
The counsel for Arsalan Iftikhar, Sardar Ishaq speaking to the media outside the Supreme Court said a decision to file damages cases against his clients accusers will be made after reviewing the three reports of the commission.
Meanwhile Arsalan Iftikhar told the media he had submitted a 200 page statement to the commission regarding allegations leveled by Malik Riaz. “I completely presented myself for accountability,” Arsalan said.
Arsalan added that he would take action against Riaz after consulting with his legal team and file the "biggest damages case in the history of Pakistan."